Hi!
On 2021-11-15 16:42, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> We have a special helper to get fwnode out of struct device.
> Moreover, dereferencing it directly prevents the fwnode
> modifications in the future.
>
> Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/i2c/muxes/i2c-mux-gpio.c | 7 ++++---
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/i2c/muxes/i2c-mux-gpio.c b/drivers/i2c/muxes/i2c-mux-gpio.c
> index 31e6eb1591bb..b09c10f36ddb 100644
> --- a/drivers/i2c/muxes/i2c-mux-gpio.c
> +++ b/drivers/i2c/muxes/i2c-mux-gpio.c
> @@ -53,6 +53,7 @@ static int i2c_mux_gpio_probe_fw(struct gpiomux *mux,
> struct platform_device *pdev)
> {
> struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
> + struct fwnode_handle *fwnode = dev_fwnode(dev);
> struct device_node *np = dev->of_node;
It feels like there is opportunity to get rid of np, but I suppose that can be
done later...
Acked-by: Peter Rosin <peda@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cheers,
Peter
> struct device_node *adapter_np;
> struct i2c_adapter *adapter = NULL;
> @@ -60,7 +61,7 @@ static int i2c_mux_gpio_probe_fw(struct gpiomux *mux,
> unsigned *values;
> int rc, i = 0;
>
> - if (is_of_node(dev->fwnode)) {
> + if (is_of_node(fwnode)) {
> if (!np)
> return -ENODEV;
>
> @@ -72,7 +73,7 @@ static int i2c_mux_gpio_probe_fw(struct gpiomux *mux,
> adapter = of_find_i2c_adapter_by_node(adapter_np);
> of_node_put(adapter_np);
>
> - } else if (is_acpi_node(dev->fwnode)) {
> + } else if (is_acpi_node(fwnode)) {
> /*
> * In ACPI land the mux should be a direct child of the i2c
> * bus it muxes.
> @@ -111,7 +112,7 @@ static int i2c_mux_gpio_probe_fw(struct gpiomux *mux,
> }
> mux->data.values = values;
>
> - if (fwnode_property_read_u32(dev->fwnode, "idle-state", &mux->data.idle))
> + if (device_property_read_u32(dev, "idle-state", &mux->data.idle))
> mux->data.idle = I2C_MUX_GPIO_NO_IDLE;
>
> return 0;
>
