Re: [PATCH v1 1/1] i2c: designware: Fix the kernel doc description for struct dw_i2c_dev

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> > Yes, I am aware of what is in the spec.
> 
> Wolfram, what do you prefer?

I prefer I2C. But it is more a reading habit. I would neither enforce
I2C nor I²C.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


[Index of Archives]     [Linux GPIO]     [Linux SPI]     [Linux Hardward Monitoring]     [LM Sensors]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Media]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux