Re: [PATCH v4 08/11] platform/x86: int3472: Add get_sensor_adev_and_name() helper

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Nov 1, 2021 at 12:49 PM Hans de Goede <hdegoede@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On 11/1/21 11:46, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > On Mon, Nov 1, 2021 at 12:44 PM Andy Shevchenko
> > <andy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

...

> > Hmm... But then in the original code and with this proposal the
> > acpi_dev_put() seems a bit strange to me.
> > If we are fine (no error code returned) why would the caller (note
> > _er_) go different paths?
>
> We always need to get the dev to get the name, but some callers are
> only interested in the name, so they pass NULL for sensor_adev_ret,
> this helps to keep the code calling this clean, which is the whole
> idea of having a helper for this.

OK.

(Not that I'm very happy with this, but... the function needs a
comment about this alternative behaviour, I forgot if it already has,
though)

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko



[Index of Archives]     [Linux GPIO]     [Linux SPI]     [Linux Hardward Monitoring]     [LM Sensors]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Media]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux