On 19-10-21, 13:15, Wolfram Sang wrote: > > > The other side is the software that has access to the _Real_ hardware, > > and so we should trust it. So we can have a actually have a completion > > without timeout here, interesting. > > So, if the other side gets a timeout talking to the HW, then the timeout > error will be propagated? It should be, ideally :) > If so, then we may live with plain wait_for_completion(). -- viresh
