On Tue, Sep 07, 2021 at 10:33:02PM +0200, Heiner Kallweit wrote: > The original change works as intended, but Andy pointed in [0] that now > userspace could re-enable RPM via sysfs, even though we explicitly want > to disable it. So effectively revert the original patch, just with small > improvements: > - Calls to pm_runtime_allow()/pm_runtime_forbid() don't have to be > balanced, so we can remove the call to pm_runtime_forbid() in > i801_remove(). > - priv->acpi_reserved is accessed after i801_acpi_remove(), and according > to Robert [1] the custom handler can't run any longer. Therefore we > don't have to take priv->acpi_lock. > > [0] https://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-i2c/msg52730.html > [1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-acpi/BYAPR11MB32561D19A0FD9AB93E2B1E5287D39@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/T/#t > > Fixes: 4e60d5dd10cd ("i2c: i801: Improve disabling runtime pm") > Reported-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxx> > Signed-off-by: Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@xxxxxxxxx> Applied to for-next, thanks!
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature