Hi, sorry for the long delay. I am not familiar with VFIO, so I had to dive into the topic a little first. I am still not seeing through it completely, so I have very high-level questions first. > The device specification can be found on > https://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/virtio-comment/202101/msg00008.html. I think we need to start here: === If ``length of \field{read_buf}''=0 and ``length of \field{write_buf}''>0, the request is called write request. If ``length of \field{read_buf}''>0 and ``length of \field{write_buf}''=0, the request is called read request. If ``length of \field{read_buf}''>0 and ``length of \field{write_buf}''>0, the request is called write-read request. It means an I2C write segment followed by a read segment. Usually, the write segment provides the number of an I2C controlled device register to be read. === I2C transactions can have an arbitrary number of messages which can arbitrarily be read or write. As I understand the above, only one read, write or read-write transaction is supported. If that is the case, it would be not very much I2C but more SMBus. If my assumptions are true, we first need to decide if you want to go the I2C way or SMBus subset. But maybe I need to undestand the following paragraph first: === A driver may send one request or multiple requests to the device at a time. The requests in the virtqueue are both queued and processed in order. === What happens if those multiple requests are sent out to the I2C bus master driver on the host? Is there one transaction with N messages or are there N transfers with 1 message each. This is a difference in I2C world (REP_START vs. STOP/START) and some devices really need this properly handled or they won't work. === The case when ``length of \field{write_buf}''=0, and at the same time, ``length of \field{read_buf}''=0 doesn't make any sense. === Oh, it does. That's a legal transfer, both in SMBus and I2C. It is used to e.g. discover devices. I think it should be supported, even though not all bus master drivers on the host can support it. Is it possible? Also, as I read it, a whole bus is para-virtualized to the guest, or? Wouldn't it be better to allow just specific devices on a bus? Again, I am kinda new to this, so I may have overlooked things. Thanks and happy hacking, Wolfram
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
