On Tue, Apr 13, 2021 at 4:31 PM Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Tue, Apr 13, 2021 at 3:21 PM Wolfram Sang <wsa@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > > > Yongjun[1] into the original patch. If Wei's patch is applied on top > > > of whats already in i2c/for-next then this patch can be ignored. > > > > I applied Wei's patch instead. It was easier. > > Where is it? i2c/for-next shows the v2 of this series being applied. Ah, I see it's a follow up. I thought it was a replacement. -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko
