On Wed, Dec 2, 2020 at 11:14 PM Ray Jui <ray.jui@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > On 12/2/2020 6:35 AM, Wolfram Sang wrote: > > > >> All review comments are scattered now, please let me know what has to be > >> done further, > >> Are we going to change the tasklet to irq thread ? > >> Are we going to remove batching 64 packets if transaction > 64B and use rx > >> fifo threshold ? > >> > >> I don't see any issue with current code but if it has to change we need a > >> valid reason for the same. > >> If nothing to be done, please acknowledge the patch. > > > > Valid request. Has there been any news? > > > > Sorry for the delay. I just replied. This patch is tested and validated with all corner cases and its working. Can we merge this and take up any improvement as part of separate patch? Thanks, Rayagonda > > > Thanks, > > Ray -- This electronic communication and the information and any files transmitted with it, or attached to it, are confidential and are intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed and may contain information that is confidential, legally privileged, protected by privacy laws, or otherwise restricted from disclosure to anyone else. If you are not the intended recipient or the person responsible for delivering the e-mail to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any use, copying, distributing, dissemination, forwarding, printing, or copying of this e-mail is strictly prohibited. If you received this e-mail in error, please return the e-mail to the sender, delete it from your computer, and destroy any printed copy of it.
Attachment:
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
