On Mon, Nov 30, 2020 at 01:31:15PM +0000, Daniel Scally wrote:
> Registering software_nodes with the .parent member set to point to a
> currently unregistered software_node has the potential for problems,
> so enforce parent -> child ordering in arrays passed to this function.
I agree with Laurent.
...
> for (i = 0; nodes[i].name; i++) {
> + if (nodes[i].parent)
> + if (!software_node_to_swnode(nodes[i].parent)) {
> + ret = -EINVAL;
> + goto err_unregister_nodes;
> + }
> +
Besides that can we pack these conditionals together?
if (nodes[i].parent && !software_node_to_swnode(nodes[i].parent)) {
Do we have sane ordering in software_node_unregister_nodes()?
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
