Hi Daniel,
Thank you for the patch.
On Mon, Nov 30, 2020 at 01:31:27PM +0000, Daniel Scally wrote:
> From: Dan Scally <djrscally@xxxxxxxxx>
>
> To make sure the new i2c_acpi_dev_name() always reflects the name of i2c
> devices sourced from ACPI, use it in i2c_set_dev_name().
>
> Signed-off-by: Dan Scally <djrscally@xxxxxxxxx>
I'd squash this with 15/18, which would make it clear there's a memory
leak :-)
> ---
> Changes since RFC v3:
>
> - Patch introduced
>
> drivers/i2c/i2c-core-base.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/i2c/i2c-core-base.c b/drivers/i2c/i2c-core-base.c
> index 573b5da145d1..a6d4ceb01077 100644
> --- a/drivers/i2c/i2c-core-base.c
> +++ b/drivers/i2c/i2c-core-base.c
> @@ -814,7 +814,7 @@ static void i2c_dev_set_name(struct i2c_adapter *adap,
> }
>
> if (adev) {
> - dev_set_name(&client->dev, "i2c-%s", acpi_dev_name(adev));
> + dev_set_name(&client->dev, i2c_acpi_dev_name(adev));
> return;
> }
>
--
Regards,
Laurent Pinchart
