On Tue, Nov 24, 2020 at 12:35 PM Hans de Goede <hdegoede@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 11/10/20 3:47 PM, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > > On Tue, Nov 10, 2020 at 1:14 PM Hans de Goede <hdegoede@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> On 11/10/20 11:10 AM, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > >>> On Mon, Nov 9, 2020 at 1:33 PM Hans de Goede <hdegoede@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > ... > > > >>> I think in general the direction to switch to fwnode is a good one. I > >>> was thinking about moving i2c core to use swnodes in which case they > >>> will utilize fwnode pointer. But it might have complications, you are > >>> right. > >> > >> So do you agree to just keep this series in the archives (in case we need > >> it later) for now ? Or would you still like me to post a non RFC version ? > > > > If nobody else has a different opinion (Heikki, Wolfram, Rafael?), I'm > > fine with it to be in archives for the time being. > > Since no-one else has responded, lets just keep this series for the > archives. > > Andy, that also means that there no longer is a reason to hold of merging > your i2c-multi-instantiate cleanup series (minus patch 3 as discussed), > so I've merged that into my review-hans branch now. Cool, thanks! -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko
