On 14/09/20 6:49 pm, Wolfram Sang wrote: >> I'm happy to route it to stable@ if you think it's worth it but I don't >> think there's a specific Fixes: reference that can be used. The current >> behavior appears to have been that way since before git (looks like we >> noticed in 2014 but it's taken me 6 years to nag people into sending >> their fixes upstream). > Better late than never :) Thanks for sending and the heads up. If you > don't need it for stable, then we should maybe not send it. It would be > nice for 9665 but we haven't tested it on 9564. But I'll let it be your > call. > Looks like it's been picked up already. If anyone does hit problems on the 9564 hopefully the interweb will lead them to this mailing list thread and they'll have some people to hassle.
