06.09.2020 01:23, Michał Mirosław пишет:
> On Sat, Sep 05, 2020 at 11:41:36PM +0300, Dmitry Osipenko wrote:
>> The "dma" variable of tegra_i2c_xfer_msg() function doesn't bring much in
>> regards to readability and generation of the code, hence let's remove it
>> to clean up code a tad.
> [...]
>> --- a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-tegra.c
>> +++ b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-tegra.c
> [...]
>> + if (i2c_dev->is_curr_dma_xfer) {
> [...]
>
> In this case I like the previous code better: just because there are
> less letters to read. :-)
Besides readability, I also don't like much that the is_curr_dma_xfer is
initialized in tegra_i2c_xfer_msg() and then could be overridden by
tegra_i2c_config_fifo_trig(). In a result the "dma" variable confuses me
since it's not instantly obvious why it's set after
tegra_i2c_config_fifo_trig().
Looking at the final result, I think it's better to have the variable
removed. It makes code more consistent, IMO.
