>>>>> "Mohammed" == Mohammed Billoo <mab@xxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: Hi, > And the answer is a patch series (I couldn't figure out the appropriate > term to google). Indeed. Please send a patch series for the needed changes to linux-i2c and put me in CC. > Also, it looks like the linux-i2c mailing list no longer exists? It does. Perhaps you need to subscribe to be able to post? My earlier reply did make it to the list: https://marc.info/?l=linux-i2c&m=159732786421840&w=2 > On Thu, Aug 13, 2020 at 10:33 AM Mohammed Billoo <mab@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> Peter, >> >> Thanks for your comment. Would you like me to resubmit the patch with your >> suggestions? >> >> Also, we'll need to incorporate big/little-endian with the GRLIB accessors >> as well (I ran into an issue where a vendor-specific AHB bridge had >> endianness conversion, but the IP designer didn't realize that and so I >> needed an accessor for both GRLIB and big-endian). I'm not sure what the >> best-practice for multiple patches is. Should I submit patch N assuming >> patch N-1 was applied? -- Bye, Peter Korsgaard
