> I've simplified the index handling as you suggested. The only impact is that > finally we do not consider anymore the I2C_SLAVE_WRITE_REQUESTED event as the > beginning of the transaction since we don't perform the "reset" of the > handling upon this event. One more comment on this one because I had to update the testunit, too. To be robust against multiple write messages in one transfer, we need to reset both, after STOP and when I2C_SLAVE_WRITE_REQUESTED. See here: 96 case I2C_SLAVE_STOP: 97 if (tu->reg_idx == TU_NUM_REGS) 98 queue_delayed_work(system_long_wq, &tu->worker, 99 msecs_to_jiffies(100 * tu->regs[TU_REG_DELAY])); 100 fallthrough; 101 102 case I2C_SLAVE_WRITE_REQUESTED: 103 tu->reg_idx = 0; 104 break; As you see, I used 'fallthrough' to avoid code duplication and that only one reset part will be updated. Dunno if you really need it, too, as I haven't seen your latest code yet.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
