On Fri, Jun 19, 2020 at 05:19:03PM +0300, Codrin Ciubotariu wrote: > Even if I2C bus GPIO recovery is optional, devm_gpiod_get() can return > -EPROBE_DEFER, so we should at least treat that. This ends up with > i2c_register_adapter() to be able to return -EPROBE_DEFER. > > Signed-off-by: Codrin Ciubotariu <codrin.ciubotariu@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > --- > drivers/i2c/i2c-core-base.c | 22 ++++++++++++++++------ > 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/i2c/i2c-core-base.c b/drivers/i2c/i2c-core-base.c > index 4ee29fec4e93..f8d9f2048ca8 100644 > --- a/drivers/i2c/i2c-core-base.c > +++ b/drivers/i2c/i2c-core-base.c > @@ -368,15 +368,16 @@ static int i2c_gpio_init_recovery(struct i2c_adapter *adap) > return i2c_gpio_init_generic_recovery(adap); > } > > -static void i2c_init_recovery(struct i2c_adapter *adap) > +static int i2c_init_recovery(struct i2c_adapter *adap) > { > struct i2c_bus_recovery_info *bri = adap->bus_recovery_info; > char *err_str; > > if (!bri) > - return; > + return 0; > > - i2c_gpio_init_recovery(adap); > + if (i2c_gpio_init_recovery(adap) == -EPROBE_DEFER) > + return -EPROBE_DEFER; > > if (!bri->recover_bus) { > err_str = "no recover_bus() found"; > @@ -392,7 +393,7 @@ static void i2c_init_recovery(struct i2c_adapter *adap) > if (gpiod_get_direction(bri->sda_gpiod) == 0) > bri->set_sda = set_sda_gpio_value; > } > - return; > + return 0; This is correct but I think the code flow is/was confusing. Can you drop this 'return' and use 'else if' for the next code block? I think this is more readable. > } > > if (bri->recover_bus == i2c_generic_scl_recovery) { > @@ -407,10 +408,12 @@ static void i2c_init_recovery(struct i2c_adapter *adap) > } > } > > - return; > + return 0; > err: > dev_err(&adap->dev, "Not using recovery: %s\n", err_str); > adap->bus_recovery_info = NULL; > + > + return 0; 'return -EINVAL;' I'd suggest. > } > > static int i2c_smbus_host_notify_to_irq(const struct i2c_client *client) > @@ -1476,7 +1479,9 @@ static int i2c_register_adapter(struct i2c_adapter *adap) > "Failed to create compatibility class link\n"); > #endif > > - i2c_init_recovery(adap); > + res = i2c_init_recovery(adap); > + if (res == -EPROBE_DEFER) > + goto out_link; Please move 'i2c_init_recovery' above the class-link creation. It shouldn't make a difference but we can skip the extra label and the ifdeffery. > > /* create pre-declared device nodes */ > of_i2c_register_devices(adap); > @@ -1493,6 +1498,11 @@ static int i2c_register_adapter(struct i2c_adapter *adap) > > return 0; > > +out_link: > +#ifdef CONFIG_I2C_COMPAT > + class_compat_remove_link(i2c_adapter_compat_class, &adap->dev, > + adap->dev.parent); > +#endif > out_reg: > init_completion(&adap->dev_released); > device_unregister(&adap->dev); > -- > 2.25.1 >
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature