On 6/2/20 5:12 AM, Quentin Strydom wrote: > Change current bus commands to match the pca9541a datasheet > (see table 12 on page 14 of > https://www.nxp.com/docs/en/data-sheet/PCA9541A.pdf). Also > where entries are marked as no change the current control > command is repeated as the current master reading the > control register has control of the bus and bus is on. > > Signed-off-by: Quentin Strydom <quentin.strydom@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> I am not going to reply to your other e-mail. After all, it is marked confidential with a lot of legalese around it. - Split long lines in your e-mails. - Do not just send the patch again, reply to the original patch with a comment such as "ping" - If you resend (for example because still no one replied after more time, or you missed some mailing lists/reviewers), mark the patch subject with "PATCH RESEND" - Never under any circumstances send an e-mail to a public list that states that "This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential ...". For my part I did not reply because I have no access to the hardware anymore, and thus can not validate if the code still works after this change (or why I didn't notice the problem when I wrote the code initially). Guenter > --- > drivers/i2c/muxes/i2c-mux-pca9541.c | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/i2c/muxes/i2c-mux-pca9541.c b/drivers/i2c/muxes/i2c-mux-pca9541.c > index 6a39ada..50808fa 100644 > --- a/drivers/i2c/muxes/i2c-mux-pca9541.c > +++ b/drivers/i2c/muxes/i2c-mux-pca9541.c > @@ -211,7 +211,7 @@ static void pca9541_release_bus(struct i2c_client *client) > > /* Control commands per PCA9541 datasheet */ > static const u8 pca9541_control[16] = { > - 4, 0, 1, 5, 4, 4, 5, 5, 0, 0, 1, 1, 0, 4, 5, 1 > + 4, 4, 5, 5, 4, 4, 5, 7, 8, 0, 1, 11, 0, 0, 1, 1 > }; > > /* >
