Re: Re: [PATCH v2] i2c: imx-lpi2c: Fix runtime PM imbalance on error in lpi2c_imx_master_enable()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi, Markus, 

> * How do you think about to replace the word “pairing” by “corresponding”?
> 
> * Will it be helpful to add an imperative wording?
>   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst?id=ffeb595d84811dde16a28b33d8a7cf26d51d51b3#n151
> 
> * Would you like to add the tag “Fixes” to the commit message?
> 
> * Are you going to take such possibilities into account for any more patches?
> 

Thank you for your advice! I will fix them soon in the next version of patch.

Regards,
Dinghao




[Index of Archives]     [Linux GPIO]     [Linux SPI]     [Linux Hardward Monitoring]     [LM Sensors]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Media]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux