On Wed, May 27, 2020 at 1:00 AM Serge Semin <Sergey.Semin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > dtc currently doesn't support I2C_OWN_SLAVE_ADDRESS flag set in the > i2c "reg" property. If it is the compiler will print a warning: Shouldn't be dtc whatever tools fixed? > Warning (i2c_bus_reg): /example-2/i2c@1120000/eeprom@64: I2C bus unit address format error, expected "40000064" > Warning (i2c_bus_reg): /example-2/i2c@1120000/eeprom@64:reg: I2C address must be less than 10-bits, got "0x40000064" > > In order to silence dtc up let's discard the flag from the DW I2C DT > binding example for now. Just revert this commit when dtc is fixed. Doesn't sound like a good idea. If user happens in between of these ping-pong change, how they will know this subtle issue? -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko
