On Sat, May 23, 2020 at 10:51:55PM +0800, Dejin Zheng wrote: > It will call devm_request_irq() after platform_get_irq() function > in many drivers, sometimes, it is not right for the error handling > of these two functions in some drivers. so provide this function > to simplify the driver. > > the first patch will provide devm_platform_request_irq(), and the > other patch will convert to devm_platform_request_irq() in some > i2c bus dirver. > > v1 -> v2: > - I give up this series of patches in v1 version. I resend this > patches v2 by that discussion: > https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/linux-i2c/patch/20200520144821.8069-1-zhengdejin5@xxxxxxxxx/ > The patch content has not changed. I don't understand. v1 has been nacked because of technical reasons. How did the discussion above change the situation? Am I missing something? > > Dejin Zheng (2): > drivers: provide devm_platform_request_irq() > i2c: busses: convert to devm_platform_request_irq() > > drivers/base/platform.c | 33 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-bcm-kona.c | 16 +++------------ > drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-cadence.c | 10 +++------ > drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-digicolor.c | 10 +++------ > drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-emev2.c | 5 ++--- > drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-jz4780.c | 5 ++--- > drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-meson.c | 13 ++++-------- > drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-mxs.c | 9 +++----- > drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-pnx.c | 9 ++------ > drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-rcar.c | 9 +++----- > drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-rk3x.c | 14 +++---------- > drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-sirf.c | 10 ++------- > drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-stu300.c | 4 ++-- > drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-synquacer.c | 12 +++-------- > include/linux/platform_device.h | 4 ++++ > 15 files changed, 72 insertions(+), 91 deletions(-) > > -- > 2.25.0 >
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
