On 20. 05. 20 16:48, Dejin Zheng wrote:
> The driver initialization should be end immediately after found
> the platform_get_irq() function return an error.
>
> Fixes: df8eb5691c48d3b0 ("i2c: Add driver for Cadence I2C controller")
I wouldn't really consider this as bug. Driver is likely not failing
when irq is not defined. It should just fail later on when
devm_request_irq is called.
Or is there any other issue with it?
> Signed-off-by: Dejin Zheng <zhengdejin5@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> v1 -> v2:
> - add Fixes tag.
>
> drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-cadence.c | 2 ++
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-cadence.c b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-cadence.c
> index 89d58f7d2a25..0e8debe32cea 100644
> --- a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-cadence.c
> +++ b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-cadence.c
> @@ -912,6 +912,8 @@ static int cdns_i2c_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> return PTR_ERR(id->membase);
>
> id->irq = platform_get_irq(pdev, 0);
> + if (id->irq < 0)
> + return id->irq;
>
> id->adap.owner = THIS_MODULE;
> id->adap.dev.of_node = pdev->dev.of_node;
>
The change is valid but the question is if make sense to do it in this
way. Some drivers are using devm_request_irq to do do job.
For example:
id->irq = platform_get_irq(pdev, 0);
ret = devm_request_irq(&pdev->dev, id->irq, cdns_i2c_isr, 0,
DRIVER_NAME, id);
if (ret)
return ret;
But I am also fine with solution above where you fail in quickest way.
Without that Fixed tag
Acked-by: Michal Simek <michal.simek@xxxxxxxxxx>
Thanks,
Michal
