> Anyway, it's just a function name, but while reading the code it was > not obvious to me that i2c_install_smbus_alert() is actually a subset > of i2c_new_client_device(). That said, I like the i2c_client_create*() > variants. I agree that i2c_client_create* is a nice naming, but it came in a bit too late. Renaming the API is a tiresome job, and it shouldn't be done (again) just for the sake of renaming IMO. That all being said, I think i2c_new_smbus_alert_device is a better naming than what is in this patchset and it is my favourite until now.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
