On 2020-01-27 10:26, Colin Ian King wrote:
> On 27/01/2020 07:43, Michal Simek wrote:
>> On 26. 01. 20 16:42, Colin King wrote:
>>> From: Colin Ian King <colin.king@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>>
>>> There is a statment that is indented one level too deeply, remove
>>
>> typo ^
>
> Can this be fixed when the patch is applied rather than sending a V2?
It can, but I think you will make it easier for Wolfram if you send a v2.
Which is the right thing to do anyway since you are missing a Fixes tag.
I think you should have one, since it is borderline if this patch is going
to make it before 5.6.
Cheers,
Peter
> Colin
>
>>
>>> the extraneous tab.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>> ---
>>> drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-xiic.c | 2 +-
>>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-xiic.c b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-xiic.c
>>> index b17d30c9ab40..90c1c362394d 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-xiic.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-xiic.c
>>> @@ -261,7 +261,7 @@ static int xiic_clear_rx_fifo(struct xiic_i2c *i2c)
>>> xiic_getreg8(i2c, XIIC_DRR_REG_OFFSET);
>>> if (time_after(jiffies, timeout)) {
>>> dev_err(i2c->dev, "Failed to clear rx fifo\n");
>>> - return -ETIMEDOUT;
>>> + return -ETIMEDOUT;
>>> }
>>> }
>>
>> When fixed.
>>
>> Acked-by: Michal Simek <michal.simek@xxxxxxxxxx>
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Michal
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
