> > Given my reasoning above, that should have happened before the warning > > was printed as well? Because same behaviour. I'd be surprised if there > > was a change... > > Pretty sure that it was happening before, but I wasn't paying much > attention back then. Thanks! All good then. Because this WARN was added to report transfers which might have never worked but went unnoticed so far. I am glad it served its purpose.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
