Re: [PATCH] Further cadence i2c buffer overrun fixes

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Andrew,

On Mon, Apr 16, 2018 at 6:55 AM Andrew Worsley <amworsley@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> After this set of changes ran over 2 days 17 hours with no i2c failures
> at 200kHz.
Can you explain this speed why you need it.
why not the standard ones.

>  Previously would lock up with BA (Bus Active) bit set
> continously with in a few hours
>



[Index of Archives]     [Linux GPIO]     [Linux SPI]     [Linux Hardward Monitoring]     [LM Sensors]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Media]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux