Hi Raul,
On 21/11/19 22:10, Raul E Rangel wrote:
> The initial patch was using the incorrect identifier.
>
> Signed-off-by: Raul E Rangel <rrangel@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> There are currently no boards using the identifier so it's fine to
> change it.
>
Right, I don't see GOOG001A being used but also I don't see GOOG0012. Anyway,
for the CrOS EC side, the change looks good to me. I think this will go through
the I2C tree?
Acked-by: Enric Balletbo i Serra <enric.balletbo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Thanks,
Enric
> drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-cros-ec-tunnel.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-cros-ec-tunnel.c b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-cros-ec-tunnel.c
> index ac2412755f0a..5d91e33eb600 100644
> --- a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-cros-ec-tunnel.c
> +++ b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-cros-ec-tunnel.c
> @@ -299,7 +299,7 @@ static const struct of_device_id cros_ec_i2c_of_match[] = {
> MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, cros_ec_i2c_of_match);
>
> static const struct acpi_device_id cros_ec_i2c_tunnel_acpi_id[] = {
> - { "GOOG001A", 0 },
> + { "GOOG0012", 0 },
> { }
> };
> MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(acpi, cros_ec_i2c_tunnel_acpi_id);
>
