RE: [PATCH] ACPI: support for NXP i2c controller

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> Hi,
> 
> On 02.09.19 23:16, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > On Mon, Sep 2, 2019 at 11:58 PM Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael@xxxxxxxxxx>
> wrote:
> >>
> >> On Thu, Jul 11, 2019 at 12:35 PM Chuanhua Han <chuanhua.han@xxxxxxx>
> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Enable NXP i2c controller to boot with ACPI
> >>>
> >>> Signed-off-by: Meenakshi Aggarwal <meenakshi.aggarwal@xxxxxxx>
> >>> Signed-off-by: Udit Kumar <udit.kumar@xxxxxxx>
> >>> Signed-off-by: Chuanhua Han <chuanhua.han@xxxxxxx>
> >>
> >> Wolfram, any objections to this from the i2c side?
> >
> > May I propose amendment(s)?
> >
> >>> @@ -44,6 +44,7 @@
> >>>   #include <linux/pm_runtime.h>
> >>>   #include <linux/sched.h>
> >>>   #include <linux/slab.h>
> >
> >>> +#include <linux/acpi.h>
> >
> > If it's kept in order, better to go with it. (Yes, it is as I have
> > checked) However, property.h should be included instead, see below.
> >
> >>>          const struct of_device_id *of_id =
> of_match_device(i2c_imx_dt_ids,
> >>>
> >>> &pdev->dev);
> >>> +       const struct acpi_device_id *acpi_id =
> >>> +                       acpi_match_device(i2c_imx_acpi_ids,
> >>> +                                         &pdev->dev);
> >
> >
> >>>          if (of_id)
> >>>                  i2c_imx->hwdata = of_id->data;
> >>> +       else if (acpi_id)
> >>> +               i2c_imx->hwdata = (struct imx_i2c_hwdata *)
> >>> +                               acpi_id->driver_data;
> >
> >
> > The above altogher may be replaced with
> >
> > const struct imx_i2c_hwdata *match;
> > ...
> > match = device_get_match_data(&pdev->dev);
> > if (match)
> >   i2c_imx->hwdata = match;
> > else
> > ...
> 
> Instead of "may be replaced", I would say: it should be replaced :)
> 
> >>> +               .acpi_match_table = ACPI_PTR(i2c_imx_acpi_ids),
> >
> > Since there is no #ifdef guard no need to use ACPI_PTR().
> >
> 
> What iMX/(other NXP?) SoCs are with ACPI support?  Where I can get one? I
> would like to know more about it.
- Nxp has variety Socs, include i.MX, Layerscape, etc.
- You can get one from here https://www.nxp.com/design/qoriq-developer-resources/qoriq-lx2160a-development-board:LX2160A-RDB

> 
> Kind regards,
> Oleksij Rempel
> 
> --
> Pengutronix e.K.                           |
> |
> Industrial Linux Solutions                 |
> https://eur01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.pe
> ngutronix.de%2F&amp;data=02%7C01%7Cmeenakshi.aggarwal%40nxp.com%
> 7C640eb015a91f4959d3b508d7303168fb%7C686ea1d3bc2b4c6fa92cd99c5c
> 301635%7C0%7C0%7C637030861076879938&amp;sdata=sPWtkVtHHDvoRR
> ZmWJuipCO%2BEwG%2BcupgZvcIV1%2BrlEY%3D&amp;reserved=0  |
> Peiner Str. 6-8, 31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0
> |
> Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686           | Fax:
> +49-5121-206917-5555 |




[Index of Archives]     [Linux GPIO]     [Linux SPI]     [Linux Hardward Monitoring]     [LM Sensors]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Media]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux