Hi,
On 03-09-19 19:52, Wolfram Sang wrote:
On Tue, Aug 20, 2019 at 05:34:40PM +0200, Wolfram Sang wrote:
No need to check the argument of i2c_unregister_device() because the
function itself does it.
Signed-off-by: Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
Hans, are you OK with this change?
Yes this is fine by me:
Acked-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@xxxxxxxxxx>
Regards,
Hans
Build tested only, buildbot is happy, too.
Please apply to your tree.
drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-cht-wc.c | 3 +--
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-cht-wc.c b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-cht-wc.c
index 66af44bfa67d..3e2608a65c06 100644
--- a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-cht-wc.c
+++ b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-cht-wc.c
@@ -363,8 +363,7 @@ static int cht_wc_i2c_adap_i2c_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
{
struct cht_wc_i2c_adap *adap = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
- if (adap->client)
- i2c_unregister_device(adap->client);
+ i2c_unregister_device(adap->client);
i2c_del_adapter(&adap->adapter);
irq_domain_remove(adap->irq_domain);
--
2.20.1
