On Thu, Aug 08, 2019 at 10:07:28PM +0200, Wolfram Sang wrote: > > > This sounds like a more in-depth fix than what we should be doing for > > stable trees. Can we revert the original patch and restore the old > > behaviour, then propose a proper feature enhancement that doesn't > > regress existing setups? > > Yes, that. > > And since some interested parties have gathered now, I start yet another > call for a maintainer for this driver. It is really needed, I'd say. > If no one against it, I will take this task. -- Pengutronix e.K. | | Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ | Peiner Str. 6-8, 31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0 | Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 |
