On Fri, Feb 22, 2019 at 12:26 AM Wolfram Sang <wsa@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Tue, Feb 19, 2019 at 11:30:27AM -0800, Jim Broadus wrote: > > A previous change allowed I2C client devices to discover new IRQs upon > > reprobe by clearing the IRQ in i2c_device_remove. However, if an IRQ was > > assigned in i2c_new_device, that information is lost. > > > > For example, the touchscreen and trackpad devices on a Dell Inspiron laptop > > are I2C devices whose IRQs are defined by ACPI extended IRQ types. The > > client device structures are initialized during an ACPI walk. After > > removing the i2c_hid device, modprobe fails. > > > > This change caches the initial IRQ value in i2c_new_device and then resets > > the client device IRQ to the initial value in i2c_device_remove. > > > > Fixes: 6f108dd70d30 ("i2c: Clear client->irq in i2c_device_remove") > > Signed-off-by: Jim Broadus <jbroadus@xxxxxxxxx> > > Adding Benjamin to CC Sorry, I should have answered earlier. I am a little bit hesitant regarding this patch. The effect is correct, and I indeed realized a few weeks ago that something were wrong as we couldn't rmmod/modprobe i2c-hid. But I still have the feeling that the problem is not solved at the right place. In i2c_new_device() we are storing parts of the fields of struct i2c_board_info, and when resetting the irq we are losing information. This patch solves that, but I wonder if the IRQ should not be 'simply' set in i2c_device_probe(). This means we also need to store the .resources of info, but I have a feeling this will be less error prone in the future. But this is just my guts telling me something is not right. I would perfectly understand if we want to get this merged ASAP. So given that the code is correct, this is my: Reviewed-by: Benjamin Tissoires <benjamin.tissoires@xxxxxxxxxx> But at least I have expressed my feelings :) Cheers, Benjamin > > > --- > > drivers/i2c/i2c-core-base.c | 9 +++++---- > > include/linux/i2c.h | 1 + > > 2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/drivers/i2c/i2c-core-base.c b/drivers/i2c/i2c-core-base.c > > index 28460f6a60cc..af87a16ac3a5 100644 > > --- a/drivers/i2c/i2c-core-base.c > > +++ b/drivers/i2c/i2c-core-base.c > > @@ -430,7 +430,7 @@ static int i2c_device_remove(struct device *dev) > > dev_pm_clear_wake_irq(&client->dev); > > device_init_wakeup(&client->dev, false); > > > > - client->irq = 0; > > + client->irq = client->init_irq; > > > > return status; > > } > > @@ -741,10 +741,11 @@ i2c_new_device(struct i2c_adapter *adap, struct i2c_board_info const *info) > > client->flags = info->flags; > > client->addr = info->addr; > > > > - client->irq = info->irq; > > - if (!client->irq) > > - client->irq = i2c_dev_irq_from_resources(info->resources, > > + client->init_irq = info->irq; > > + if (!client->init_irq) > > + client->init_irq = i2c_dev_irq_from_resources(info->resources, > > info->num_resources); > > + client->irq = client->init_irq; > > > > strlcpy(client->name, info->type, sizeof(client->name)); > > > > diff --git a/include/linux/i2c.h b/include/linux/i2c.h > > index 65b4eaed1d96..7e748648c7d3 100644 > > --- a/include/linux/i2c.h > > +++ b/include/linux/i2c.h > > @@ -333,6 +333,7 @@ struct i2c_client { > > char name[I2C_NAME_SIZE]; > > struct i2c_adapter *adapter; /* the adapter we sit on */ > > struct device dev; /* the device structure */ > > + int init_irq; /* irq set at initialization */ > > int irq; /* irq issued by device */ > > struct list_head detected; > > #if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_I2C_SLAVE) > > -- > > 2.20.1 > >