On Fri, Feb 15, 2019 at 05:17:27PM +0800, Hsin-Yi Wang wrote: > Ok, I can add a check in another patch. Should we return NULL pointer > if msg->len is 0 or print out some warnings? Thanks. No warning, msg->len == 0 is a valid setting. But interesting question: I was about to say NULL, but your driver would assume ENOMEM there and discard the message which is also not correct since msg->len == 0 is a valid setting. So, should we just return msg->buf then? Will this work with your driver? Can it handle zero-length transfers? > On Fri, Feb 15, 2019 at 5:10 PM Wolfram Sang <wsa@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > On Fri, Feb 15, 2019 at 05:02:02PM +0800, Hsin-Yi Wang wrote: > > > i2c_get_dma_safe_msg_buf() allocates space based on msg->len. If threshold is > > > 0 and msg->len is also 0, function makes zero-length allocation, which returns > > > a special ZERO_SIZE_PTR instead of a NULL pointer, and this will cause later > > > code to fail. Modify the threshold to > 0 so the function returns NULL pointer. > > > > > > Fixes: fc66b39fe36a ("i2c: mediatek: Use DMA safe buffers for i2c transactions") > > > Signed-off-by: Hsin-Yi Wang <hsinyi@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > > Right. But we need to fix i2c_get_dma_safe_msg_buf(), so it will be > > handled for all callers. Do you want to add a check if msg->len is 0 or > > shall I? Both fine for me. > >
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature