On Mon, Feb 11, 2019 at 6:24 AM Steven Rostedt <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Sun, 10 Feb 2019 19:40:21 -0800 > John Sperbeck <jsperbeck@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > If an smbus transfer fails, there's no guarantee that the output > > buffer was written. So, avoid trying to show the output buffer when > > tracing after an error. This was 'mostly harmless', but would trip > > up kasan checking if left-over cruft in byte 0 is a large length, > > causing us to read from unwritten memory. > > This looks fine to me, but I'm not sure how the i2c maintainers feel, > but I always require that a new patch version starts a new thread, and > not be part of a older thread release (causes these patches to be > hidden from those that read patches in threading mode). That sounds reasonable to me. Unless I hear otherwise, I'll create a v3 as a new thread. Thanks.
