On Friday, February 8, 2019 2:19:05 PM CET Andrew Lunn wrote: > On Fri, Feb 08, 2019 at 10:52:13AM +0100, Federico Vaga wrote: > > Hi Andrew, > > > > My patch for this (that is waiting since October 2018) has been reviewed > > by > > Peter at least once, and we agreed to make it ready for a > > master_xfer_irq_less() proposal. In case that proposal evolves in an > > actual > > change, then the driver will be ready for it with minimal changes. > > Hi Federico > > Maybe it is me being impatient, i'm mostly a netdev maintainer, where > things get reviewed in 3 days, not five months. However, it is now 5 > months later, and master_xfer_irq_less() has not happened. Is it > really going to happen? I do not know > Are you making it happen? No > Do we want to add a more invasive patch for something which might never > happen? I do not understand why you say so. The differences are not that big, I may have wrote more code and more comments but I would not say that it is invasive. > > If you have improvements or comments can you do it on the patch (V2) I > > sent > > > > https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/990283/ > > In the end, i don't care if it is my patch or yours for polled IO. I > would just like to see one of them merged in the next week or two > before the next merge window opens. Please could you repost your patch > series so we can review it. I do not mind what get integrated, as you, I want to use a polling interface without compiling my own out-of-tree module. I will re-send V3 for the entire patch set. > > Thanks > Andrew
