On Tue, Feb 05, 2019 at 01:44:44PM +0100, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 25, 2019 at 02:11:42PM +0100, Thierry Reding wrote:
> > From: Thierry Reding <treding@xxxxxxxxxx>
> >
> > If an I2C adapter doesn't match the provided device tree node, also try
> > matching the parent's device tree node. This allows finding an adapter
> > based on the device node of the parent device that was used to register
> > it.
> >
> > This fixes a regression on Tegra124-based Chromebooks (Nyan) where the
> > eDP controller registers an I2C adapter that is used to read to EDID.
> > After commit 993a815dcbb2 ("dt-bindings: panel: Add missing .txt
> > suffix") this stopped working because the I2C adapter could no longer
> > be found. The approach in this patch fixes the regression without
> > introducing the issues that the above commit solved.
> >
> > Fixes: 17ab7806de0c ("drm: don't link DP aux i2c adapter to the hardware device node")
> > Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <treding@xxxxxxxxxx>
>
> Removed the duplicated Tested-by and applied to for-next, thanks!
>
> I applied to -next because I want this core change more regression
> testing in next. If this goes good, I will do a cleanup series to not
> use the of_node of the parent twice.
And there is a regression! Good that I didn't push out before
double-checking. No one noticed that this breaks registering child
devices because of_i2c_register_devices() doesn't have a pointer to work
with anymore?
Removing that patch from the queue.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
