On Thu, Jan 17, 2019 at 11:11:09AM +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> Hi Wolfram,
>
> On Thu, Jan 17, 2019 at 1:36 AM Wolfram Sang
> <wsa+renesas@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > pd->pos won't be smaller than -1, so we can simplify the logic.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> Thanks for your patch!
>
> > --- a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-sh_mobile.c
> > +++ b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-sh_mobile.c
> > @@ -392,13 +392,9 @@ static int sh_mobile_i2c_isr_rx(struct sh_mobile_i2c_data *pd)
> > int real_pos;
> >
> > do {
> > - if (pd->pos <= -1) {
>
> If this condition is never true, shouldn't the block just be removed instead?
"pd->pos won't be *smaller* than -1"
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
