Re: [PATCH v2 07/13] i2c: acpi: Introduce i2c_acpi_get_i2c_resource() helper

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Nov 27, 2018 at 11:07:19AM +0200, Mika Westerberg wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 26, 2018 at 05:08:52PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > Besides current two users one more is coming. Definitely makes sense to
> > introduce a helper.

> Since this is exported, you may want to add kernel-doc here.

OK.

> > +++ b/include/linux/acpi.h
> > @@ -1054,6 +1054,17 @@ static inline int acpi_dev_gpio_irq_get(struct acpi_device *adev, int index)
> >  }
> >  #endif
> >  
> > +#if defined(CONFIG_ACPI) && IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_I2C)
> > +bool i2c_acpi_get_i2c_resource(struct acpi_resource *ares,
> > +			       struct acpi_resource_i2c_serialbus **i2c);
> > +#else
> > +static inline bool i2c_acpi_get_i2c_resource(struct acpi_resource *ares,
> > +					     struct acpi_resource_i2c_serialbus **i2c)
> > +{
> > +	return false;
> > +}
> 
> I think this belongs to include/linux/i2c.h where we have
> i2c_acpi_find_bus_speed() and friends.

I don't think so. It operates on top of data structures defined solely under
ACPI umbrella. If I move them to i2c.h it would look inconsistent.

Perhaps you would like to have different namespace for it (like acpi_i2c_ ?).

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko





[Index of Archives]     [Linux GPIO]     [Linux SPI]     [Linux Hardward Monitoring]     [LM Sensors]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Media]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux