On Thu, Nov 15, 2018 at 8:54 AM Peter Rosin <peda@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On 2018-11-15 08:23, Vincent Palatin wrote: > > Add all the JEDEC-registered manufacturer names added since JEP106AQ. > > This is not a complete description of the change. > > > Signed-off-by: Vincent Palatin <vpalatin@xxxxxxxxx> > > --- > > eeprom/decode-dimms | 82 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-- > > 1 file changed, 80 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/eeprom/decode-dimms b/eeprom/decode-dimms > > index ede3ec6..9ead960 100755 > > --- a/eeprom/decode-dimms > > +++ b/eeprom/decode-dimms > > @@ -336,8 +336,86 @@ $revision =~ s/ \([^()]*\)//; > > "AP Memory", "Douqi Technology", "Etron Technology Inc.", > > "Indie Semiconductor", "Socionext Inc.", "HGST", "EVGA", > > "Audience Inc.", "EpicGear", "Vitesse Enterprise Co.", > > - "Foxtronn International Corporation", "Bretelon Inc.", > > - "Zbit Semiconductor Inc."] > > + "Foxtronn International Corporation", "Bretelon Inc.", "Graphcore", "Eoplex Inc", > > *snip* > > > + "Zbit Semiconductor Inc", "Shenzhen Technology Co Ltd", "Signalchip", > > "Zbit Semiconductor Inc" has moved (and lost a dot), what's up with that? This is what the JEDEC JEP106AX document says: """ The following numbers are all in bank 10: [...] 94 Zbit Semiconductor Inc [...] """ While where it was in bank 9 for current code, there is definitely Graphcore at index 95: """ 92 Vitesse Enterprise Co 93 Foxtronn International Corporation 94 Bretelon Inc 95 Graphcore """ Looking at it, the change is not document in the JEP Annex but another project (OpenOCD) did a similar fixup: https://repo.or.cz/openocd.git/commitdiff/063253fa89b2d48104b43783c03ff7161c5d1a5a Maybe there was a mistake in a previous revision of the JEP106 (but strangely it was silently fixed) or everybody copied the content from a broken source. There is no dot in the Standard document, I don't know what the local convention is in this project. -- Vincent
