On Tue, Aug 07, 2018 at 09:48:26AM +0530, Vinod wrote: > On 06-08-18, 11:03, Bjorn Andersson wrote: > > On Mon 06 Aug 04:04 PDT 2018, Vinod Koul wrote: > > > > > From: Todor Tomov <todor.tomov@xxxxxxxxxx> > > > > > > Add DT binding document for Qualcomm Camera Control Interface (CCI) > > > I2C controller. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Todor Tomov <todor.tomov@xxxxxxxxxx> > > > Signed-off-by: Vinod Koul <vkoul@xxxxxxxxxx> > > > --- > > > .../devicetree/bindings/i2c/i2c-qcom-cci.txt | 55 ++++++++++++++++++++++ > > > 1 file changed, 55 insertions(+) > > > create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/i2c/i2c-qcom-cci.txt > > > > > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/i2c/i2c-qcom-cci.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/i2c/i2c-qcom-cci.txt > > > new file mode 100644 > > > index 000000000000..977978dd4444 > > > --- /dev/null > > > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/i2c/i2c-qcom-cci.txt > > > @@ -0,0 +1,55 @@ > > > +Qualcomm Camera Control Interface (CCI) I2C controller > > > + > > > +Required properties: > > > + - compatible: Should be one of: > > > + - "qcom,cci-v1.0.8" for 8916; > > > + - "qcom,cci-v1.4.0" for 8996. > > > > As pointed out by Rob previously we should either use version numbers or > > platform numbers, not both. Not really what I said... > > > > So this should either be: > > > > - "qcom,cci-v1.0.8" > > - "qcom,cci-v1.4.0" > > ok will use this one.. > > > > > or: > > > > - "qcom,msm8916-cci" > > - "qcom,msm8996-cci" I strongly prefer this one as I've yet to be convinced there is a strong benefit of version numbers and every other binding follows this convention. Rob
