> --- a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-xlp9xx.c
> +++ b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-xlp9xx.c
> @@ -191,28 +191,30 @@ static void xlp9xx_i2c_drain_rx_fifo(struct xlp9xx_i2c_dev *priv)
> if (priv->len_recv) {
> /* read length byte */
> rlen = xlp9xx_read_i2c_reg(priv, XLP9XX_I2C_MRXFIFO);
> + len--;
I don't know the HW and assume the above line is correct because of
merging two interrupts into one. However, the line looks a bit stray,
and I wonder if we shouldn't add a comment somewhere explaining the
situation similar to the second paragraph of the commit message?
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
