On Mon, Jul 23, 2018 at 9:12 AM, Peter Rosin <peda@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On 2018-07-23 05:40, Manivannan Sadhasivam wrote:
>> + /* Handle the remaining bytes which were not sent */
>> + while (!(readl(i2c_dev->base + OWL_I2C_REG_FIFOSTAT) &
>> + OWL_I2C_FIFOSTAT_TFF) && i2c_dev->msg_ptr < msg->len) {
>
> You moved the OWL_ line to the left instead of right, so this is still
> misaligned and thus not helping the reader.
Guys, wouldn't be better to
while (i2c_dev->msg_ptr < msg->len) {
u32 fifostat = readl();
if (!(fifostat & ...))
break;
...
}
?
Same for the other branch.
Yes, it's more LOCs, but less bikeshedding,
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
