On Fri, Jul 20, 2018 at 01:43:46PM -0500, Grygorii Strashko wrote: > > > On 07/17/2018 06:57 AM, Sekhar Nori wrote: > > On Friday 13 July 2018 08:50 PM, Alexander Sverdlin wrote: > > > If CLKH is set to 0 I2C clock is not generated at all, so avoid this value > > > and stretch the clock in this case. > > > > This must be by observation since specification does not seem to state > > this. > > It will be good to know (mention) on what hw was it observed? Some more info would also help me to decide if this is stable material or not. Is it a bug fix or more theoretical (but still valid, of course)?
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
