> instead of changing this "1" to "scl"? Same-same, but it looks odd > to use scl as argument to sda (at least without that comment about > sda following scl that is present inside the loop below). > > At the same time, your version make the code inside the loop the > same as this initializing code. Oh well, your call... Yes, I wanted them to look alike. Yet, I agree to your comment about moving the comment. Will update.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
