On Tue, 2018-06-26 at 15:30 +0200, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote: > 2018-06-26 15:23 GMT+02:00 Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxx > tel.com>: > > On Tue, 2018-06-26 at 14:36 +0200, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote: > > > 2018-06-26 14:14 GMT+02:00 Andy Shevchenko > > > <andriy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>: > > > > On Tue, 2018-06-26 at 09:41 +0200, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote: > > > > > What is your use case exactly? Do you have an EEPROM model > > > > > that's > > > > > not > > > > > yet supported explicitly in the driver? Why would you need > > > > > this > > > > > option? > > > > > > > > The current at24 driver has no address width support, > > > > thus, reusing same > > > > (allocated) IDs (non-DT case) is hard. > > > > ^^^^^ > > > > > Every supported compatible has the width already specified in its > > > corresponding chip data. > > > > > > Please, read again carefully what I wrote before. > > > > Ok makes sense in that case. Could you just point me towards an > example model which has the address width different than the default > for its type? AFAIK, it's a companion device inside the camera voice coil IC, i.e. DONGWOON DW9714. -- Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Intel Finland Oy
