On Thu, Jun 07, 2018 at 03:52:03PM +0530, Shah, Nehal-bakulchandra wrote: > On 6/4/2018 10:45 PM, Bjorn Helgaas wrote: > > On Mon, Jun 4, 2018 at 11:33 AM Shah, Nehal-bakulchandra > > <Nehal-bakulchandra.Shah@xxxxxxx> wrote: > >> > >> Hi All, > >> > >> Please help in reviewing the patch. > > > > If you'd like PCI review, please post the patches to linux-pci@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx. > > This patch is more onto I2C which is using PCI Interface. Is it > still good to send for linux-pci review? I am really confused how to > take it forward. Your suggestion will be well appreciated. You sent this to linux-pci: To: Wolfram Sang <wsa@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "mika.westerberg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <mika.westerberg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "linux-acpi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <linux-acpi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "linux-pci@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <linux-pci@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> ... Hi All, Please help in reviewing the patch. That looks like a request for PCI folks to review your patch. My point is simply that if you would like PCI people to review it, you should send the patch to linux-pci@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx. > >> -----Original Message----- > >> From: linux-i2c-owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:linux-i2c-owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Wolfram Sang > >> Sent: Friday, June 1, 2018 3:13 AM > >> To: Shah, Nehal-bakulchandra <Nehal-bakulchandra.Shah@xxxxxxx> > >> Cc: linux-i2c@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Singh, Sandeep <Sandeep.Singh@xxxxxxx>; S-k, Shyam-sundar <Shyam-sundar.S-k@xxxxxxx>; Kai Heng Feng <kai.heng.feng@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > >> Subject: Re: [PATCH] i2c:amd I2C Driver based on PCI Interface for upcoming platform > >> > >> Hi, > >> > >>> I am waiting for the feedback on this patch. It has been there since > >>> long time. Can you please provide the feedback. > >> > >> Well, reviewing drivers is a community effort these days. While I am part of this community, I am surely not the only one. So, please ask the list for help (rather than me personally). Furthermore, I think I am not the right person here to ask for help. I don't know much about PCI & ACPI. We have dedicated I2C-ACPI maintainers, maybe they have some bandwidth for review? > >> > >> That being said: yes, it is sad that you need to wait this long; yet I simply can't fill up all the resource problems we have here. > >> > >> Thanks, > >> > >> Wolfram > >> > > Thanks, > Nehal Shah
