Hi Peter, I love your patch! Yet something to improve: [auto build test ERROR on linus/master] [also build test ERROR on v4.17-rc6] [if your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, please drop us a note to help improve the system] url: https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Peter-Rosin/rtmutex-allow-specifying-a-subclass-for-nested-locking/20180526-140421 config: x86_64-randconfig-i0-201820 (attached as .config) compiler: gcc-7 (Debian 7.3.0-16) 7.3.0 reproduce: # save the attached .config to linux build tree make ARCH=x86_64 All errors (new ones prefixed by >>): kernel/locking/locktorture.c: In function 'torture_rtmutex_lock': >> kernel/locking/locktorture.c:444:2: error: implicit declaration of function 'rt_mutex_lock'; did you mean 'ww_mutex_lock'? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration] rt_mutex_lock(&torture_rtmutex); ^~~~~~~~~~~~~ ww_mutex_lock cc1: some warnings being treated as errors vim +444 kernel/locking/locktorture.c 095777c4 Davidlohr Bueso 2015-07-22 441 095777c4 Davidlohr Bueso 2015-07-22 442 static int torture_rtmutex_lock(void) __acquires(torture_rtmutex) 095777c4 Davidlohr Bueso 2015-07-22 443 { 095777c4 Davidlohr Bueso 2015-07-22 @444 rt_mutex_lock(&torture_rtmutex); 095777c4 Davidlohr Bueso 2015-07-22 445 return 0; 095777c4 Davidlohr Bueso 2015-07-22 446 } 095777c4 Davidlohr Bueso 2015-07-22 447 :::::: The code at line 444 was first introduced by commit :::::: 095777c417db142970adeb776fa0cb10810b8122 locktorture: Support rtmutex torturing :::::: TO: Davidlohr Bueso <dave@xxxxxxxxxxxx> :::::: CC: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> --- 0-DAY kernel test infrastructure Open Source Technology Center https://lists.01.org/pipermail/kbuild-all Intel Corporation
Attachment:
.config.gz
Description: application/gzip