On 2018-05-21 09:34, Wolfram Sang wrote: > Trivial, but still: the failed symlink is not *for* the channel but a > link *to* the channel. > > Signed-off-by: Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Applied to i2c-mux/for-next. Cheers, Peter
On 2018-05-21 09:34, Wolfram Sang wrote: > Trivial, but still: the failed symlink is not *for* the channel but a > link *to* the channel. > > Signed-off-by: Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Applied to i2c-mux/for-next. Cheers, Peter