In the for-loop test, ret will be either 0 or 1. So, the
comparison is pointless. Drop it, and drop the initializer
which is then also pointless.
Signed-off-by: Peter Rosin <peda@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-robotfuzz-osif.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-robotfuzz-osif.c b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-robotfuzz-osif.c
index 51d93b4b00f2..d848cf515234 100644
--- a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-robotfuzz-osif.c
+++ b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-robotfuzz-osif.c
@@ -62,10 +62,10 @@ static int osif_xfer(struct i2c_adapter *adapter, struct i2c_msg *msgs,
{
struct osif_priv *priv = adapter->algo_data;
struct i2c_msg *pmsg;
- int ret = 0;
+ int ret;
int i;
- for (i = 0; ret >= 0 && i < num; i++) {
+ for (i = 0; i < num; i++) {
pmsg = &msgs[i];
if (pmsg->flags & I2C_M_RD) {
--
2.11.0
