Hi Mark, > > And maybe this could be used here, too? Introduce this flag for very > > late/early messages. If they have it, messages are even sent in > > suspend_noirq() phase with the master_xfer_irqless() callback, otherwise > > we will have the WARNing printed out. > > It feels like it'd be more elegant to have the core select the irqless > function automatically if called after interrupts have been disabled - > otherwise we end up with the need to special case through other layers > of the stack like regmap as well which seems like it'd be error prone. Yes, I was concerned about thae (i.e. regmap accessors), too. > OTOH it does mean we might not notice things happening later than they > should so it's not 100% clear... What do you mean here? Thanks, Wolfram
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
