Hey Sricharan,
On 4/13/2018 12:14 AM, Sricharan R wrote:
Hi Austin,
On 4/5/2018 1:14 AM, Austin Christ wrote:
The I2C spec UM10204 Rev. 6 specifies the following timings.
Standard Fast Mode Fast Mode Plus
SCL low 4.7us 1.3us 0.5us
SCL high 4.0us 0.6us 0.26us
This results in a 33%/66% duty cycle as opposed to the 50%/50% duty cycle
used for Standard-mode.
Add High Time Divider settings to correct duty cycle for FM(400kHz) and
FM+(1MHz).
Signed-off-by: Austin Christ <austinwc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-qup.c | 10 ++++++++--
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-qup.c b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-qup.c
index cb14687..2a88611 100644
--- a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-qup.c
+++ b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-qup.c
@@ -1858,9 +1858,15 @@ static int qup_i2c_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
size = QUP_INPUT_FIFO_SIZE(io_mode);
qup->in_fifo_sz = qup->in_blk_sz * (2 << size);
- fs_div = ((src_clk_freq / clk_freq) / 2) - 3;
hs_div = 3;
- qup->clk_ctl = (hs_div << 8) | (fs_div & 0xff);
+ if (clk_freq <= I2C_STANDARD_FREQ) {
+ fs_div = ((src_clk_freq / clk_freq) / 2) - 3;
+ qup->clk_ctl = (hs_div << 8) | (fs_div & 0xff);
+ } else {
+ /* 33%/66% duty cycle */
+ fs_div = ((src_clk_freq / clk_freq) - 6) * 2 / 3;
+ qup->clk_ctl = ((fs_div / 2) << 16) | (hs_div << 8) | (fs_div & 0xff);
+ }
while here, can we add a small comment for the above calculation. why the -3 above and -6 ?
Good question. This is the exact math recommended in the HPG for fs_div
with and without the high time divider set. There is not explanation for
the differences in the math in the hardware documentation that I've
seen. What is the preferred way for documenting something like this in
comments?
Regards,
Sricharan
--
Qualcomm Datacenter Technologies as an affiliate of Qualcomm
Technologies, Inc.
Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. is a member of the
Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project.
