On 2018-04-11 12:09, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote: > 2018-04-11 11:56 GMT+02:00 Peter Rosin <peda@xxxxxxxxxx>: >> On 2018-04-10 15:12, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote: >>> We switched to using probe_new(), so this is no longer used >>> by i2c core. >> >> It seems to be used in i2c_device_match() ??? >> >> This could easily be me not understanding something... >> > > Yes, but i2c core no longer uses the id_table field in struct > i2c_driver. We call i2c_device_match() ourselves instead of letting > i2c core do it and pass the driver data to probe(). > > Hope that helps, > Bartosz > But, i2c_device_match is a static function in the core. I think you are confusing it with i2c_match_id, which is in fact called from the static i2c_device_match (with is a bus operation). So, no, it didn't really help... Cheers, Peter
